Fennell v The Queen [2019] HCA 37 (06 November 2019) (Kiefel CJ, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ) - 13wentworthselbornechambers
17117
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-17117,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-16.8,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_top,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.5.2,vc_responsive
 

Fennell v The Queen [2019] HCA 37 (06 November 2019) (Kiefel CJ, Keane, Nettle, Gordon and Edelman JJ)


Catchwords:


Criminal law – Murder – Appeal – Appeal against conviction – Where appellant convicted by jury ­– Where Crown case based entirely on circumstantial evidence – Where circumstantial evidence related to opportunity and motive and miscellany of other inculpatory matters – Where evidence of opportunity and motive extremely weak – Where evidence connecting accused to alleged murder weapon based on glaringly improbable identification evidence – Whether verdict unreasonable or cannot be supported having regard to evidence.

Words and phrases – “basis for an inference”, “circumstantial case”, “contamination of recollection”, “credibility and reliability”, “glaringly improbable”, “identification evidence”, “identification of object”, “motive”, “murder weapon”, “opportunity”, “unreasonable verdict”.