Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 (14 August 2019) (Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [190]) - 13wentworthselbornechambers
16874
post-template-default,single,single-post,postid-16874,single-format-standard,ajax_fade,page_not_loaded,,qode-child-theme-ver-1.0.0,qode-theme-ver-16.8,qode-theme-bridge,disabled_footer_top,wpb-js-composer js-comp-ver-5.5.2,vc_responsive
 

Mekhail v Hana; Mekail v Hana [2019] NSWCA 197 (14 August 2019) (Basten JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Emmett AJA at [190])


Catchwords:


PROBATE – contested grant – suspicious circumstances – whether proponent of will had discharged onus – will left whole estate to propounder – solicitor who explained and witnessed will believed propounder was testatrix’s only daughter and next of kin – solicitor’s erroneous beliefs caused by lies by those benefitting under will – inability to rely on solicitor’s evidence to discharge onus – requirement to consider entirety of suspicious circumstances – appeal allowed and earlier will admitted to probate – consideration of merits of approach in Gill v Woodall [2011] Ch 380; [2010] EWCA Civ 1430

SUCCESSION – application for provision – dependency – factors warranting – whether primary judge erred in failing to find nephew dependent on deceased – dependency conceded at trial – whether primary judge erred in failing to find primary facts on financial position and need